根据昨天公布的文件，欧盟委员会已选择对从中国进口的电动自行车征收临时反倾销税。

每项业务将征收关税，关税税率为83.6％，降至21.8％。在英国，从明天（7月19日）开始征收关税，在海关放行货物之前，应支付临时反倾销税的押金。

请有兴趣的人在8月12日之前向委员会提交意见。代表众多企业，Leva-EU支持的欧洲电动自行车进口商集体将对委员会提起法律质疑，以抗议据称不太公平的听证程序。

公司的职责是：

其他大多数中国出口商将被收取37％的费用，但许多人将被征收83.6％的税。

作为调查的一部分，巨人和博多以及Jinhau Vision Industry和Suzhu Rununion Motivity Co都是委员会访问过的人。欧洲生产商Accell集团，Derby Cycle，Eurosport和off shoot Prophete GmbH在欧盟进行了访问。

进口商之间的不安已经导致企业采取应对措施，无论是将生产转移到台湾，还是重新组装CI.N 本周早些时候见证了英国商业Wisper。

在文件结论中，委员会指出：

“虽然不能排除这些措施对有关产品的小进口商和消费者价格的不利影响，但它并没有超过供应商，工会业和消费者的利益。

“在上述基础上，委员会得出结论认为，没有令人信服的理由认为，在调查的这个阶段，对源自中国的有关产品的进口实施临时措施并不符合国际电联的利益。

“根据委员会就倾销，损害，因果关系和联盟利益达成的结论，应采取临时措施，防止倾销的中国进口产品对联合工业造成进一步伤害。”

原文：

European Commission opts for provisional dumping duties on Chinese electric bikes
The European Commission has opted to impose provisional anti-dumping duties on electric bikes imported from China, according to documents published yesterday.
Duties will be imposed on a per business basis with tariffs ranging 83.6% down to 21.8%. In the UK, duties will apply from tomorrow (July 19th), where a deposit to the value of the provisional anti-dumping duty shall be paid before goods are released by Customs.
Those with an interest are invited to submit comments to the Commission until August 12th. On behalf of numerous businesses the Leva-EU backed Collective of European Electric Bike Importers will pursue a legal challenge against the Commission in protest of what has allegedly been a less than fair hearing process.
By company the duties are:
The majority of other Chinese exporters will be charged 37%, though many will see a 83.6% duty imposed.
Giant and Bodo, alongside Jinhau Vision Industry and Suzhu Rununion Motivity Co were among those visited by The Commission as part of the investigation. European producers Accell Group, Derby Cycle, Eurosport and off shoot Prophete GmbH were visited in the EU.
Unease among importers has already lead to businesses taking counter measures, whether it be relocating production to Taiwan, or even reshoring assembly as CI.N witnessed earlier this week with UK business Wisper.
In the documents conclusions the Commission states:

“Although an adverse effect of the measures on small importers of the product concerned and on prices to consumers could not be ruled out, it does not outweigh the benefits to suppliers, the union industry and consumers.
“On the basis of the above, the Commission concluded that there were no compelling reasons that it was not in the Union interest to impose provisional measures on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC at this stage of the investigation.

“：On the basis of the conclusions reached by the Commission on dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, provisional measures should be imposed to prevent further injury being caused to the Union industry by the dumped Chinese imports.”
More to follow as we trawl the documents for detail.